Thursday, July 28, 2011

Final Exam

Deep Web Resource -  Clay Skirky

 I went to the Cannell Library and went over to Newspapers and clicked on the button.  Then I scrolled down to newspapers and found Wall Street Journal.  Then I went to ProQuest.  I went to the Advanced Search and I typed in the Title and Authors First name and Authors Last name.  I then went to the Date Range and put in 06/05/2010 and the article popped up.  I then clicked on “Full Text” and the full article came up. 

Open web – Yahoo!  Nicholas Carr

I used Yahoo! As my search engine.  Then I typed in “Does the Internet Make You Smarter or Dumber?  Wall Street Journal.  Hit search.  Many websites came up and I scrolled down to the one with the title and the author’s name. Then right above the website there was another website called [DOC] userhome.brooklyn.cuny.edu and I clicked on the View as Html and the full document popped up.

For the Deep Web article by Clay Shirky:

A) Authority: I scrolled down to the Indexing and clicked on Author:  This gave me six documents that the author had published for the Wall Street
Journal.  There was an ISSN: number and ProQuest Document number.

B) Sources: There really wasn’t a source, or works cited.

C) Purpose: The article compares and contrasts the internet and all of its technical advantages as to the way it use to be, which was by obtaining information from books.  Is this new way good or bad for the society of the future.

D) Evenness:  I think this author is somewhat bias in his attempt to defend the internet.

E) Coverage: There is no table of contents or index, as it is a newspaper article.
 
F) Timeliness: The date is fairly current and the article relates to the current times we live in.

 For the Open Web article by Nicholas Carr:
 
A) Authority:  I had to use Google Scholar to check on the author. There were many references that came up. So I believe he is a credible author.
 I used Google Books to check on the publisher and the Wall Street Journal definitely came up.

B) Sources:  He cites his sources throughout his article.

C) Purpose: The purpose of the article is to compare and contrast continuous use of the web.

D) Evenness: I thought this was an even un bias opinion.

E) Coverage: There is no table of context or index as it is a newspaper article

F) Timeliness:  The article was written in June of 2010 so is a fairly current article

I chose the article by Nicholas Carr.  I found the studies he quoted about our ability to comprehend less information when we are always “plugged in” to be somewhat unsettling.  I do think they have a point about how societies of today rely so heavily on the web or social media.  The young and older generations are getting bombard by mass information in so many different forms that it does not surprise me that these studies are coming out showing a lack of cognitive skills, especially in being able to focus.

My grandson is a good example of this.  He is twelve and already is showing signs of really being “board” or discontented if he is not “linked in” to something.  I remember as a child we would look out the window when riding in a car. Now I look over and see my grandson with his head looking down right at his ipod playing games or checking messages or what ever.  So goes by the beautiful scenery and what ever else may be pleasing to look at. It will be interesting to see how he does at great grandma’s house picking apricots and no internet!

With that being said I do believe all of this technology and social media does have its place in the world.  I can’t imagine living with out some of the conveniences that it allows us.  However, there is a “balance” that one must adhere too.  If we don’t take the time to slow down some, clear our minds, find a good book to read (off line) and do some of the old fashion things we use to do then I think we are in for some social and behavior problems that as a society we will have to address.  This goes to my first question when I started this class which was, how does the use of the internet affect our social skills?  I feel like I have come full circle and it just happened.  So in conclusion there are pro’s and con’s to our brave new world.


Summary

Here is the link to my webpage;
http://twoplayfulotters.com/students/bvancleave.html


The internet is an amazing tool that has been invented and created in this last century.  We have invented a whole new vocabulary just to accommodate the use of this incredible tool.  The internet with its vast number of computers and networks linked all around the world connecting to  the world wide web  with all of its links is really mind boggling. 
I can remember when I took a class years ago at WSU and the e-mail feature had just come out.  Our assignment was to send an e-mail to the teacher to see if we could do it.  I remember the steps that you had to go through just to send an e-mail and now I can't imagine living with out it. So after taking this class and exploring all of the different ways to get and receive information makes one reflect on just how far we have come!
They keep improving on the web and on social media for that matter, and I wonder what else can they possibly do to improve but they always create something.   Just the complexity of writing the code to get a browser to come up and everything you look at has code behind it is incredible.  So  just by doing the "web page" assignment gave me a real sense of how much time and work has gone in to this form of communication.
Has my understanding of the internet, web, and how information gets from point A to point B improved?  Yes it has and I have a deeper appreciation for how it all works and is put together.  I know the last 20 years there has been leaps and bounds so it will be interesting to see what will they come up with next?  To be continued ......

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Summary

I found in researching this subject, what is fracking doing to our water supply, the top level domains that seemed to have the most information was the .org and the .com.  The .gov and .edu domains were very concise and had more charts and data supporting their evidence. They all had something to offer and there was a lot to wade through.  Putting in the domains in the advance search site helped a lot in narrowing down the search.  Finding reliable information on this subject and not just opinion was all so challenging.  Using the "about us" helped to determine if the site was credible.  I felt like most of the sites I visited had merit.  I pretty much just stayed away from the blogs and wiki sites.

When searching in the subject directories I didn't find a lot on fracking if at all.  Maybe I was doing something wrong.  I tried about three of them and I used Boolean operators and it still did not give me much info.  Water contamination would come up but as soon as I put the word frack*, fracking, hydraulic fracking in it gave me 0 results.

I think the open web was still harder to narrow down the subject and had a lot of websites, some periodical articles but not many books, unless you went to Google Books.  Then there were books on the subject but then finding out what domain the books fell under was another challenge.   I think I did this assignment correctly but there is still a lot to learn.

Web Site #4 (org.)

a) Yahoo!

b) I changed the search to( water contamination using fracking) I put this in the advanced search in Yahoo! and marked the .org domain

c) Lustgarten, Abrahm. ProPublica. "Scientific Study Links Flammable Drinking Water to Fracking." 9 May 2011.  Web. July 26, 2011 
<www.propublica.org/...flammable-​drinking-water-to-fracking>

d) This site is credible because it was written as recently as 2011, it had scientific data presented, and ProPublica is an independent, non profit newsource.

Web Site # 3 (gov)

a) Yahoo!

b) I put in fracking (water or contamination ) . gov

c) United States. Cong. Senate. Cardin, Ben. "Cardin Calls for GAO Study of Hydraulic Fracking."  28 June  2011.  Web. July 26, 2011. <cardin.senate.gov/...for-gao-study-of-​hydraulic-fracking>

d)  This site is credible because it uses a current date and it is posted by a reliable author the US Senator of Maryland.  It is a unbiased article explaining the pros and cons of drilling for gas in a responsible manner. It is also educating the public as to what is going on with fracking.

Web Site #2 (.edu)

a) Yahoo!

b) Went to advance search put in water and fracking and contamination. Chose the edu.domain website

c) Osborn, Stephen G, Avener Vengosh, Nathaniel R. Warner, Robert B. Jackson. "Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing." PNAS. vol. 108 no. 20. 17, May 2011. p. 8172-8176. Web. July 2011

d) This site is credible because it is written by respected authors, the article is edited ,was written in a  concise manner, it has a bibliography, and was a current article. It showed charts, graphs, and had a fair and balanced approach to the article.

Web Site #1 (.com)

a) Yahoo!

b)  I put in fracking and water contamination

c) Caruso, David B. "`Fracking` Pollution In Water: Pennsylvania Allows Natural Gas Drilling Waste Disposal In Waterways."  Huffington Post  3 Jan. 2011. Web. 26 July.  2011,  <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/>.

d) This site is credible because it comes from a reputable newspaper and it is a timely article.